Mennonite World Review LogoMennonite World Review

Last updated April 30.

April 30, 2012 issue

Franconia, Eastern District discuss a future together

By Emily Ralph Franconia Mennonite Conference

LANSDALE, Pa. — Members of Eastern District and Franconia conferences of Mennonite Church USA met March 29 at Christopher Dock Mennonite High School to continue conversations about a shared future.

From left, Sandra and Dave Hersh from Grace Mennonite Church (Eastern District), Ken Handrich from Germantown Mennonite Church and Diane Bleam from Bally Mennonite Church (Franconia) reflect on the diversity of theology within Eastern District and Franconia conferences.

From left, Sandra and Dave Hersh from Grace Mennonite Church (Eastern District), Ken Handrich from Germantown Mennonite Church and Diane Bleam from Bally Mennonite Church (Franconia) reflect on the diversity of theology within Eastern District and Franconia conferences. — Photo by Emily Ralph/Franconia Conference

The gathering, the first of two forums to be held this spring, focused on developing a deeper understanding of the 1847 split in Franconia Conference that led to the formation of Eastern District Conference.

Although some people think a merger is a done deal, it isn’t, said Ron White, moderator of Eastern District Conference.

Conference leaders are following the delegates’ directive from the 2011 assembly to move forward in exploring and listening, he said in his welcome.

When White asked how many people had attended an event or service in a congregation from the other conference, nearly every hand went up.

“See, we’ve already been working together,” he said.

Jim Musselman of the Zion congregation and John L. Ruth of the Salford congregation, unofficial historians for the two conferences, told the history of the 1847 split, the tensions leading up to it and the fallout in the years following it.

The progressives — a group that broke off to later become Eastern District Conference — were looking for modern administration, freedom in dress and conduct, education for pastors, and the creation of publications, Musselman said. The years following the split were tumultuous for the new conference, with further division as differing theological strains emerged.

“Almost every positive thing that the Eastern District leaders wanted eventually came to Franconia Conference; it just took 100 years longer,” Ruth said. “It would have come sooner to Franconia Conference if they all would have stayed together.”

In the end, Ruth said, both sides lost: “There was not much creativity in finding ways of love and respect for each other.”

continued on next page »

Comments

  • Thanks, Emily! This is a great report of an exciting development.

    - Forrest Moyer (apr 23 at 4:05 p.m.)

  • Thanks, Emily. You did a good job of capturing the essence of the first forum. It's neat to see leaders from the two conferences coming together seeking God's direction for a shared future.

    - Warren Tyson (apr 24 at 9:58 a.m.)

Comment on the article Franconia, Eastern District discuss a future together

Please keep comments civil. MWR editors reserve the right to remove any comment. When posting a comment, you agree to the MWR Comments Policy. Name and comment will be posted; commenters are strongly encouraged to give their full name. Email address is for follow-up only and will not be made public.

  • HTML tags are not permitted in comments and will be removed. Markdown syntax may be used for emphasis, blockquotes and links.

MWR Classifieds

Job listings and other offerings

This Week’s Front Page

image of May 13 front page Download a PDF version of page one of MWR's May 13 print edition.

© 2012, Mennonite World Review Inc. | All rights reserved.

129 W 6th St Newton KS 67114 | 800-424-0178 | For reprints, write editor (at) mennoworld.org

Made with Django. thanks to dirt circle. icons by famfamfam.

Loading